DimWit Politics

Democrats Try To Shut Down Durham Probe

 Breaking News
  • Schiff Attempts to Obstruct Solomon Probe In a move reminiscent of former President Obama secretly monitoring and targeting Fox’s investigative reporter James Rosen as a “criminal co-conspirator,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff revealed that he...
  • Historians Slam NYT’s skewed “1619 Project” Rewriting or obliterating history for the benefit of creating a political narrative has become an alarming and disturbing trend regardless if it’s tearing down historical monuments depicting a pivotal moment...
  • Illinois Bill Would Pay Reps Only For Days Worked Most people don’t expect to get paid if they don’t show up for work. No so for Illinois state representatives and senators due to a legal loophole that pays them...
  • CNN Denounces Black Trump Supporters On Monday, a despicable racist tweet by deranged CNN host Ana Navarro attacking black Trump supporters went viral. The caustic commentator apparently riled by reports showing that black support for...
  • An Extreme Never-Trumper Is Making A Comeback… For the past eight months, conservative Republican apostate, Steve Schmidt, had mercifully disappeared from the lineup of MSNBC false flag panelists.  His last known one-time Republican credential was as an...

Democrats Try To Shut Down Durham Probe

Democrats Try To Shut Down Durham Probe
October 02
16:05 2019

It’s beginning to appear – at least from my perspective – that the whistleblower dust-up and the abrupt call for impeachment (without an actual vote), may be nothing more then a clever ruse to distract from what’s coming down the pike. In particular, Attorney General Barr along with U.S. Attorney John Durham’s ongoing probe into possible criminal actions by the intelligence community at the outset of the Russia investigation.

Last week a surrogate of the Democratic Party, The New York Times attempted to run interference for the Dems by identifying the whistleblower as a member of the INTEL Community, hoping to give just enough legitimacy to the individual without actually revealing his name.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

This Monday the TIMES once again attempted to run interference for panicky Democrats by publishing an exposé claiming that the President “pressed” the prime minister of Australia for information regarding the witch hunt conducted by Special Counsel Robert Mueller along with his Democratic-appointed Clinton attorneys.

Democrats are fearful that U.S. Attorney John Durham’s ongoing investigation abroad will finally uncover the organs framing President Trump, which appears may have had the blessings of former President Barack Obama, along with his handpicked INTEL operatives within the FBI, CIA, and the Justice Department.

Which brings us back to the revised rules governing the whistleblower complaints enacted only weeks before a CIA operative and avowed anti-Trump partisan assigned to the White House “leaked” secondhand information which is a crime, unless given special immunity which was conveniently provided by the “Whistleblower Protection Act” reclassifying firsthand knowledge to anyone making a claim regardless of whether that individual was actually a party to that act…no doubt a slippery slope, and more likely a haven for leakers in avoiding a criminal prosecution.

The pronged attack by Democrats along with their surrogates in the media like the NY Times exposé on Monday caught the attention of South Carolina’s Lindsey Graham stating, “This New York Times article about Barr talking to Australia is the beginning of an effort to shut down Barr’s investigation to find out how this whole thing started,” Graham said on Fox’s “Hannity.”

Indeed, Democrats are in panic mode, knowing that no-nonsense U.S. Attorney John Durham has been given “carte-blanche” to go wherever the investigation leads him.

Graham said that Barr should be talking with Australia as well as the U.K. and Italy in order to do his job properly. He also said he would write a letter to those three countries asking them to cooperate with Barr and cited a letter his colleagues sent to Ukraine last year asking them to cooperate with Mueller or the U.S. would stop sending aid.

“So here’s what I want American people to know: it’s OK to cooperate with Mueller to get Trump but it’s not OK to cooperate with Barr to find out if Trump was the victim of an out-of-control intelligence operation,” Graham said. “We’re not going to have a country like that.”

The double-standard is obvious to anyone looking at the series of events the moment Donald Trump became President, in fact, a headline running in 2016 by the New York Daily News, called for the President’s impeachment.

As for the current investigation, Attorney General Barr asked President Trump to make introductions to foreign countries that might have had information pertinent to  John Durham’s ongoing probe.

The President spoke candidly to reporters on May 24th that he instructed the attorney general to “look at” a variety of countries that may have information as to how this witch hunt began.

“But, for over a year, people have asked me to declassify,” Trump said. “So, what I’ve done is, I’ve declassified everything. He can look, and I hope he looks at the U.K., and I hope he looks at Australia, and I hope he looks at Ukraine. I hope he looks at everything because there was a hoax that was perpetrated on our country. It’s the greatest hoax.”

As for the Times and the rest of the mainstream media fronting for the Democrats, regardless of how many slim-balls crawl out of the deep state, or how many phony articles are written. The truth of what occurred during the 2016 election will finally come out…hopefully, they’ll be some serious jail time for the players who attempted to take down a duly “elected President.”

About Author

Robert. A

Robert. A

Related Articles

2 Comments

  1. CHARLIE M
    CHARLIE M October 04, 12:08

    IF THE COUNTRY DOES NOT SEE CONCIDERAL JAIL TIME FOR THE “TREASONOUS” GROUP, THIS WILL CONTINUE TO OCCUR!
    IF THERE WAS EVER A SITUATION THAT WARRANTS “NO MERCY” THIS IS IT
    WE SHOULD NOT BE CONCERNED THAT THE OUTGOING PRESIDENT STARTED THIS MESS

    AT LEAST NOW OBAMAS LEGACY WILL FINALLY BE ACCURATE FOR HISTORY TO KNOW

    Reply to this comment
  2. baggriff
    baggriff October 04, 17:12

    From my perspective it looks shady form all angles! This is no longer over site of the Government and is direct interference in the operation of the Government and goes way beyond their Job!!
    No one talked about impeaching President Truman for destroying letters from General Eisenhower to General Marshal that he was going to leave his wife for his driver in world war two. This was done after Eisenhower ran for President to protect Eisenhower’s wife!

    no Democrat would do the to day!!!!

    Reply to this comment

Write a Comment

Special Offer

Latest Comments

I sometimes think Mr. Musk is a kook, but this is a very noble effort...

It's better to have a gun and not need it, than to need a gun...

You mean RINO? Republican In Name Only. That's more accurate. My state is full of...

Take a Look!

Don’t Miss This!

12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt Displaying 12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt.