DimWit Politics

Was the Whistleblower Rule Secretly Changed to Entrap the President?

 Breaking News
  • Schiff Is Screwed: Whistle Blower May Not Testify It’s been several weeks since it was first reported that someone had come forward accusing the President of a wrongful act regarding a phone call with the newly elected Ukrainian...
  • Hunter Biden Suddenly Steps Down In a bizarre almost surreal move Hunter Biden has suddenly stepped down from the board of BKR, a Chinese private equity firm. Meanwhile, his father was on the campaign trail...
  • Trump Campaign Blasts Fox News Poll as “Garbage” The Trump campaign criticized the methodology of a recent Fox Poll which claimed that 51% of Americans want the President impeached and removed from office. The usually pro-Trump network either...
  • NJ Democrat Calls Out Liberal Identity Politics There’s been a lot of talk lately about identity politics – but what is it, exactly? The dictionary definition is “politics in which groups of people having a particular racial,...
  • NBA Kowtows To China Over Hong Kong The National Basketball Association (NBA) has kowtowed to the Communist Chinese government which is currently battling hoards of mostly-peaceful political protestors in the central streets of the island nation of...

Was the Whistleblower Rule Secretly Changed to Entrap the President?

Was the Whistleblower Rule Secretly Changed to Entrap the President?
October 01
14:17 2019

Over the weekend we learned that the rules governing a whistleblower were “officially” and abruptly changed between May 2018 and August 2019 — which is the official time-line made public by the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG).

However, those dates seem at odds with the actual events surrounding the July 25th phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

The new version of the whistleblower complaint form, allowing secondhand and even third-hand knowledge of wrongdoing was uploaded on September 24th, 2019, at 4:25 p.m., just days before the anti-Trump complaint was declassified and released to the public.

However stamped markings on the form indicate that the complaint form was revised sometime in August of 2019, a month after the infamous July 25th phone call.

The dates and the timeline are significant in that it may show there was a conspiracy to entrap the President by those within the Intelligence Community, along with perhaps elected officials coordinating with the whistleblower before the release of the information was made public.

The newly revised “Disclosure of Urgent” form which the intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) is required to submit under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act (ICWPA), along with details surrounding a complaint.

However, the secretive nature and ambiguity as to the exact date the whistleblower rule was changed leads one to conclude that there’s something a lot more sinister here.

For example, was the whistleblower rule specifically changed to accommodate the leaker? Thus legitimizing an unlawful act.

The complaint alleges that President Donald Trump broke the law during a phone call with the Ukrainian president. In his complaint, which was dated August 12, 2019, the complainant acknowledged he was “not a direct witness” to the wrongdoing he claims Trump committed.

Republican House Leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy said, “Whistleblowers were required to provide direct, first-hand knowledge of allegations…but just days before the Ukraine whistleblower came forward, the IC secretly removed that requirement from the complaint form. We won’t rest until we have answers.”

It would appear that the deep-state is working overtime to undo the 2016 election, the sham hearings held on Thursday by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff along with his Democratic cronies attempting to smear the acting director of national intelligence Joseph Maguire, is reminiscent of Schiff’s shameful attempts to fool the public with his misleading lies, concerning the Presidents involvement in the Russian collusion hoax.

Maguire was subjected to a continuous barrage of shameful allegations regarding his handling of the complaint, explaining to Chairman Schiff that he was following the letter of the law concerning his role as acting director of national intelligence, moreover making sure that he was acting in accordance with the law governing the executive branch and the separation of powers.  However, a smug and arrogant Schiff attempted to browbeat Maguire for delaying for mere weeks the delivery of a whistleblower report, suggesting that he was perhaps engaged in a cover-up.

As for the so called whistleblower and the abrupt change in the rules, regarding second-hand knowledge or hearsay. Simply listen to a portion of the testimony provided by this partisan CIA anti-Trump and draw your own conclusions.

“I have received information from multiple U.S. Government officials,” “officials have informed me,” “officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me,” “the White House officials who told me this information,” “I was told by White House officials,” “the officials I spoke with,” “I was told that a State Department official,” “I learned from multiple U.S. officials,” “One White House official described this act,” “Based on multiple readouts of these meetings recounted to me,” “I also learned from multiple U.S. officials,” “The U.S. officials characterized this meeting,” “multiple U.S. officials told me,” “I learned from U.S. officials,” “I also learned from a U.S. official,” “several U.S. officials told me,” “I heard from multiple U.S. officials,” and “multiple U.S. officials told me.”

The question that no one is asking is why those individuals with FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE haven’t come forward? Moreover, has their testimony been corroborated? And if so let’s hear directly from them!

About Author

Robert. A

Robert. A

Related Articles

6 Comments

  1. Defiant One
    Defiant One October 02, 18:26

    First, let’s set the record straight. These are no longer Democ-RATS, haven’t been for decades; they are Godless, Satan worshiping, power-mad, NWO-elitist ghouls. They have accomplished dumbing-down, drugging-up, PC bullying and brainwashing the dumb-(m)asses of the left while also allowing an invasion of illegal aliens ( a voting bloc that they can control) and God knows how many terrorists! They know that they haven’t a chance in hell (where most will be residing if they don’t repent) of beating Trump in 2020. These demonic psychopaths and their suicidal useful minions are not going to stop their goal of destroying what is left of this THIRD WORLD BANANA REPUBLIC that we have become; just look at LOST Angeles in Cali-PORN-ia, , NY SHITTY, SHIT-cago, DIRT-roit, FILTH-adelphia and Balti-MORASS, all diseased SH!T-HOLES by design! Leprosy is even making a comeback in Cali-PORN-ia due to them and their anti-American, anti-life, anti-family, anti Christian and pro-death, pro-Satan policies! WTFU, REVOLUTION will be the required SOLUTION – bet on it! Armr====================================? – – – – – – – -, we’ll be needing them! If I was in charge of the “Re-PUNK-licans” I’d be calling for red states to start manning militias because ultimately these devil’s disciples will disarm “US” incrementally as their suicidal useful idiots ( snowflake millennials) gladly aid and abet in their demise as well as the rest of “US” WTFU, the truth hurts but (keeps) you free, the party is over, get it?

    Reply to this comment
  2. Phil in TX
    Phil in TX October 02, 21:04

    “The question that no one is asking is why those individuals with FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE haven’t come forward? Moreover, has their testimony been corroborated? And if so let’s hear directly from them!”
    Exactly! Where are these “officials” with their first hand knowledge? This is all hearsat until these “officials” come forward with their first hand knowledge, and totally useless as evidence of ANY wrongdoing on the prat of President Trump.

    Phil in TX

    Reply to this comment
  3. Jersey Prophet
    Jersey Prophet October 02, 22:29

    What strikes me is the passive tense used when describing the change in the whistleblower form. “…the rules governing a whistleblower were “officially” and abruptly changed…”

    It’s as if rules just change with no governing authority. NO! Someone had to issue a n order to change them! That someone KNEW the change HAD to be made because only by so doing can everyone’s asses be covered – the actual conspirators and the so-called whistleblower who was by definition NOT a whistleblower until the definition was secretly enlarged to enable whistleblowing by proxy!

    There is NO doubt this rule was changed to enable this sham to go forward. If the president and his Justice Dept. don’t prosecute and jail these gutter creeps, they will have only themselves to blame for the success of the impeachment which is based on this sham!

    Reply to this comment
  4. baggriff
    baggriff October 02, 23:06

    So me cant wright an ex post facto law! but we can we wright an ex post facto rules to circumvent the rule of law?! Lets change the rules in the medal of the game so no one nose what they are till you brake them!

    Reply to this comment
  5. Papasierra
    Papasierra October 03, 04:48

    For 8 years Obbama refused to prove to satisfaction that he was in fact a born American. Anyone that wanted that proof was ridiculed and named a “Birther” by the libtards. But that’s ok. Obama raised the national debt and put us billions of dollars in debt to China. But that’s ok. Obumer bowed to a foreign leader. But that’s ok. Slick Willy sold us out. But that’s ok. He disgraced the presidency to the world. But that’s ok.He was responsible for the housing loan crisis.But that’s ok. Hillary left our boys to die and then later said “at this point what does it matter?” But that’s ok. The body count behind the Clintons was uncountable as uncountable as the lies and crooked dealings. But that’s ok. Trump asks a non partial entity to look into the dealings of a known dishonest individual. O My God he must be impeached!!Even my 8 year old grandson can see threw this libtard hipocracy. He asks me why do they want to let illeagles be citizens? Why do they want to take our guns away? I ask, why have they let welfare become a legacy instead of a temporary aide? Why do they blow smoke out their ass letting minorities believe raising minimum wage is a good thing when the reality is that it costs more jobs than it creates? Why do they label us homophobic if we do not agree with homosexuality, transgenders or same sex marriage,Why? I have the same right to not like something or someone as well as they have the right to do it. Why is there something wrong with us if our values, beliefs, Morales and religious preferences differ from the PC bull crap they try to shove down our throats.Why will without doubt, will I be labeled negatively by the liberal PC’s that read this.
    The man is known to be less than honest so why did the line not investigate rather than criminalizing Trump for doing what should have been done? It sure does appear that they only want to accuse Conservatives of criminal behavior while they try to make themselves Gods gift to humanity?

    Reply to this comment

Write a Comment

Special Offer

Latest Comments

Joe and Hunter Biden can run, but they cannot hide anymore since the Democrats do...

I applaud this man because everything he says is true, I don't like where our...

Good for you Rizzoli, come to the light and leave the dark Democrats behind.…...

Take a Look!

Don’t Miss This!

12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt Displaying 12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt.