DimWit Politics

Sanctuary cities protect illegal immigrants from terror

 Breaking News
  • Ilhan Omar pushes for Anti-Israel BDS Movement It was simply a matter of time before Rep. llhan Omar (D-MN) shown her true colors, as a confirmed enemy of Israel the only true democracy within the Middle East....
  • Colorado State: Avoid Saying ‘America’ and ‘Americans’ The PC Police are at it again, regarding what to say, and how to say it. Aside from those “FREE SPEECH ZONES” on campuses where a student is limited to...
  • NOT asking about citizenship is political The Trump administrations wants to ask if a person living in America is a citizen as part of the decennial census due to be conducted in 2020.  Democrats have responded...
  • So … who is doing the vetting? It would be difficult, if not impossible, to argue that President Trump’s administration has not had a more than average problem with its major appointments.  Sometimes they are controversial because...
  • Pelosi wins round one against Ocasio-Cortez Not since the introduction of female mud wrestling has the been a more entertaining battle between two ladies than the political pugilism currently occurring between the reigning champion of the...

Sanctuary cities protect illegal immigrants from terror

Sanctuary cities protect illegal immigrants from terror
May 15
14:16 2019

According to a recently released study, sanctuary city policies have continually blocked federal authorities from deporting illegal immigrants who come from countries which have been designated as state sponsors of terrorism by the U.S. State Department.

The study – released on the 9th of May – conducted by the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), found, “For a 27-month period ending on December 31, 2017, law enforcement agencies and jails refused to honor 44 immigration holds on citizens from countries the United States has designated as state sponsors of terrorism.

Of the 44 illegal immigrants from state-sponsored countries who were blocked from being deported, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) classified 39 of them as level 1 and 2 threats.

Included among the offenses committed by these illegals was a homicide, sexual assault, kidnapping, aggravated assault, burglary, and fraud.

A state sponsor of terror is defined as any country that the secretary of state concludes is continuously lending financial or other kinds of support to aid acts of terrorism. The four countries which currently meet this criterion includes North Korea, Sudan, Iran, and Syria.

In a statement, the Executive Director of the Immigration Reform Law Institute, Dale L. Wilcox, said, “Sanctuary laws are no longer a theoretical faculty lounge debate, they are causing very real threats to our safety as individuals and as a nation… Already there are innocent victims who have lost their lives as a result of sanctuary laws that defy common sense.”

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that of the states which have continually refused detainer requests for these criminal illegal immigrants from ICE, California comes in at the head of the pack.

During the time period of the study, the one-party leftist state refused to hand over 27 illegal aliens who hailed from countries on the state-sponsors of terrorism list. In second place, with eight, was Washington state. Minnesota and Iowa tied for third, with both states protecting two illegal immigrants each. Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Massachusetts, and Illinois all were found to have refused one detainer request each.

“If one of these aliens shielded from the law commits an act of mass terrorism, the politicians and activists who push for sanctuary laws will have a lot to answer for,” Wilcox added in his statement.

The study follows a seemingly ever-escalating debate regarding the role ICE plays in catching and deporting illegal migrants.

In response to President Trump’s stance toward illegal immigration, a growing number of left-leaning states and jurisdictions have put into place policies which essentially tie ICE’s hands behind their back.

Many state legislatures that are controlled by conservatives have responded to these drastic measures by banning such practices via the withholding of funds to cities who have attempted to enact sanctuary policies.

The Trump administration has too looked to counter sanctuary city laws by utilizing the power of the purse. President Trump recently sparked outrage and controversy when he proposed bussing illegal migrants into ‘sanctuary cities’ and releasing them there to punish those pushing for these dangerous policies. If we follow liberal logic, these cities should be grateful.

About Author



Related Articles


  1. Bill
    Bill May 16, 18:24

    The Dumbocrats will do anything for votes. We the people don’t count anymore.

    Reply to this comment
  2. george
    george May 16, 19:37

    How can these city administrators ignore the national law and not be held accountable?

    Reply to this comment
  3. Phil in TX
    Phil in TX May 17, 00:15

    We’ve been very lucky…….so far. These Demshevik controlled cities and states will be called to account if there is a terror attack and it can be traced back to their policies. Then it’ll be SHTF time for them.

    Phil in TX

    Reply to this comment

Write a Comment

Special Offer

Latest Comments

The guide recommends the use of ‘U.S. citizen’ instead of ‘American’ because “the Americas encompass...

View Discussions . Their must...

I refuse to participate in this deranged thinking. "They" want us to be "tolerant". ...

Take a Look!

Don’t Miss This!

12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt Displaying 12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt.