DimWit Politics

The Politics of Caravan-ism

 Breaking News
  • Are Liberals Causing WildFires? The massive outbreak of raging wildfires in California drew a series of eye-opening tweets from President Trump criticizing state officials about their environmental regulations and water management policies. Experts have...
  • Campaign Finance Laws Need To Be Repealed… For the Most Part Our most recent election cycle had one characteristic like so many before it: The political left again called for campaign finance reform that would “drive money out of politics.” Oh,...
  • The Comedy of Political Comity The most common refrains in politics today are those calls for more civility. We need to respect the opinions of others. We need more tolerance. So sayeth almost everyone. Of...
  • Caravan to Sue Trump For Violating Their Rights Consider who benefits the most from illegal immigration. The first and most obvious winner is the DNC, which is happy to obtain scores of new voters. If you look at...
  • CNN’s Don Lemon Lives Up to His Name If the bosses at CNN ever wonder why their network has slowly sunk into a distant third place among the cable news programs (and 11th place for all cable programming),...

The Politics of Caravan-ism

The Politics of Caravan-ism
October 29
17:54 2018

Perhaps it is just my Florida perspective, but the caravan of migrants heading for America’s southern border reminds me of our frequent hurricanes.  They start out a long way away, and they grow as they approach the border.  We get daily reports of the progress.  We are never quite certain what will happen when they reach landfall.  Will it just be utter devastation or just a bad hair day.  And … they always result in political fallout.

The caravan of migrants currently passing through Mexico is a bit of a human hurricane.  It started out with fewer than 2000 people but has quadrupled as it moved northward.  We do not know how many will actually arrive at our border since new recruits appear to be offset by those giving up in the face of U.S. warnings or deciding to accept Mexico willingness to offer asylum.

So, who are these people?  Why are they coming here? And why such an organized caravan rather than the usual appearance of individuals, families or small groups appearing at our border on a daily basis?

These questions are not easy for most Americans to answer because there are two VERY different answers to each of those questions.

If you follow the east coast left-wing news, you will be led to believe that these are mostly families and women and lots of children.  They are escaping the horrors of crime and poverty in their ancestral homes – most from Honduras and Guatemala.  The images are heart breaking.  On television, they appear to be those “huddled masses yearning to breathe free” for whom Lady Liberty lifts her lamp “beside the golden door.”

And yes, we are the most tolerant and immigrant friendly nation in the world – maybe even in the history of the world.  We should welcome new arrivals – especially those who bring value or are escaping dangerous oppression – because we need them to both create and fill the new jobs of a growing economy.

In bragging onto ourselves, however, we should also remember that virtually every new immigrant class was met with opposition, prejudice and hostility.  It was the case with the Irish, the Italians, the Poles, the Chinese, the Vietnamese, Africans, Jews, Arabs and, of course, Latinos.  Thankfully, we are better at assimilating than welcoming.

In terms of the caravan, the left is basing its position on a huge straw man argument – that those concerned are motivated by racial prejudice and a white fear of what is now referred to collectively as “brown people” – a euphemism for all non-white.  The left claims to be fighting against racism when what they are fighting for is to pack the population with people they believe will be politically sympathetic.

The basic issue, however, is illegal immigration.  There has been no objection to people entering the United States through the legal process by which they can be vetted.  This includes those applying for one of the various forms of visas and those seeking asylum.  That should be a universal desire, but the left sees no reason to not bypass that process by allowing anyone to slip across the border or to apply for asylum and then blowing off the obligatory follow-up court date – known as “catch and release.”

Based on those 10-plus million already residing in America, we know that approximately 10 percent are deportable criminals.  We know that at least 50 percent of the employable are without jobs – obviously not including the dependent children.  Those proportions generally hold up even as the number of illegal aliens increases.  So, it is safe to assume that 10 percent of those in the caravan are likely to be criminals — undesireables.  Now we do not know that for sure, and the only way we can separate the criminals from the majority good folks is by vetting.

We also know that the criminal elements cross our border illegally because they cannot pass the vetting process.  We can assume that based on logic and the fact that most of the criminal class did enter illegally.

There is also the health issue.  One of the primary activities of the matriculation process is to determine the health of individuals entering the country – even Americans returning from overseas.  We need only recall the extreme vetting of people returning from Africa during the Eboli crisis or from China during the SARS epidemic.  The laws of probability tell us that a significant number of those in the caravan coming from nations where the poor receive lousy healthcare will have serious diseases.  We may not know how many or who, but that again is why vetting is so important.

Since there is a clear political underpinning to our immigrations process, it is reasonable to learn what has motivated this particular caravan.  How did they get so organized and who is doing the organizing?  Who is paying for it?  This is not an organic pilgrimage.  To understand the motivation, we need to know who is sponsoring this long, logistically complex and expensive caravan – and why.

Though it has been just a war of words at this point, it is important to find out if there are any bad international actors using the caravan as a Trojan Horse.  It would be surprising if there were not.  We know that Jihadists have tried to use every means to enter the country – and often succeeded.  In fact, there already have been caravan people identified as having come from non-Latin nations, such as India and the Middle East.  There numbers may be relatively few, but it is important to ascertain their reason for taking this route.

When viewing all those pictures and videos of the women and children, we should keep in mind that almost 80 percent of the travelers are military age males – mostly unmarried.  Just look in the background behind those touching images of families and children – or take a closer look at the wider view images of the caravan — and you will see mostly males.  This, in and of itself, is not damning, but one wonders why the liberal media goes so far to avoid more objective imagery.

The solution is quite simple.  We should vet those entering through the legal process and turn away ALL who will not do that.  Instant deportation.  Those who do not appear for their court dates to complete the process of asylum should be found and potentially deported.  Deport a few and many will start showing up for those court dates.

There is only one way to have a legal and safe immigration process and that is to enforce the laws.

So, there ‘tis.

 

AUTHOR POSTSCRIPT

An invasion by any other name

The liberal news media has been very critical of President Trump’s use of the word “invasion” to
describe the caravan of migrants heading to America’s southern border. The have even gone so far as to
use the fact that the Jewish temple shooter used the word “invasion” to suggest an inspirational link to
Trump. That is just dishonest.

Referring to the large numbers of foreigners crossing the American border illegally has been informally
referred to as an “invasion” for decades. Trump did not originate the use of the word in these situations
and is by far not the only person to do so.

The media implies that it is an improper use – that Trump is sensationalizing the situation to reflect
badly on the caravan participants. If you check out the dictionary, however, you will find that Trump
and others are using the word well within its meaning.

In one definition, it refers to an incursion into a nation or region by an armed force, but there are those
other meanings – specifically “an incursion by a large number of people…” or “and unwelcome intrusion
into another’s domain.”

So … Trump’s use of the word is spot on and cannot be said to have inspired the shooter. For people
devoted to the written word, the anti-Trump media’s politically biased spin is shameful.

About Author

Larry Horist

Larry Horist

Larry Horist is a conservative activist with an extensive background in economics, public policy and politics. Clients of his consulting firm have included such conservative icons as Steve Forbes and Milton Friedman, as well as the White House. He has testified as an expert witness before legislative bodies, including the U. S. Congress, and lectured at major colleges and universities. An award-winning debater, his insightful and sometimes controversial commentaries appear frequently on the editorial pages of newspapers across the nation. He can be reached at lph@thomasandjoyce.com.

Related Articles

11 Comments

  1. Ginger
    Ginger October 30, 18:35

    I agree 100%. I went through the immigration process with my husband, and all who want to enter the USA should be required to do the same. No exceptions.

    Reply to this comment
  2. Mark
    Mark October 30, 18:50

    You are entirely correct. The thing that pisses me off the most is that they are carrying their homeland flags, a defiant gesture, at best.

    Reply to this comment
    • Kat
      Kat October 30, 19:31

      Interesting observation..

      So does this translate into an equivalent take on the Confederate Flag? The “defiant” part, I mean …

      (*** justaskingforafriend **)

      Reply to this comment
  3. NavyJR
    NavyJR October 30, 19:23

    Most fail to show for their hearings because they already KNOW they do not qualify for refugee or asylum status; they came illegally for that reason in the 1st place. Then they hide out in the sanctuaries leftists provide to break our economy and shift our culture.

    Reply to this comment
  4. RLHHoof
    RLHHoof October 30, 19:28

    Okay, I want to see your (supposed) statistics of 10% are criminals, your statement of Middle Easterners in the “scaravan”, and your fabricated “80% military age males”. More tactics to “scare up support”. I definitely agree with vetting, and I am NOT in favor of open borders, but you are STILL using those “alternate facts” to promote your stand. Let’s agree to use only REAL facts, and not conjecture to merely scare people into following your agenda, okay?
    PS: For all of you who will attack me with the basic “Liberal Snowflake” assault, PLEASE read the last half of my post that states that I am AGAINST open borders and FOR vetting. Save us BOTH some time.

    Reply to this comment
  5. Beachbum
    Beachbum October 30, 20:36

    It is an invasion. We have to protect our borders. The far left think George Soros, the intentb is to destroy our way of way & turn us in a socialist society. If President Trump let’s them in he will be criticized & if he stops them he will be criticized. These people will use women & children as shields. No way this will end before some woman or child is killed & all hell will break lout. Our president will be blamed. What makes them think they have a right to storm our borders.?

    Reply to this comment
  6. Kat
    Kat October 30, 20:44

    Hey, Larry, where *is* my comment.. you know, about bringing flags being defiant. You remember, when I asked if that translated to Confederate flags…

    And, oh .. you and I need to have a conversation regarding the difference between ‘connotation’ and ‘denotation.’ Very relevant when throwing words like “invasion” around on right-wing media. Looking forward to that.

    Reply to this comment
  7. BC
    BC October 31, 08:05

    The health issue was highlighted in a documentary I saw recently about an Orthodox Jew in USA who had a mysterious illness which to cut the story short was traced to trichonomisis. Which you only get from pork. As is well know Jews especially Orthodox avoid pork. Baffling yes? It turned out they had a Guatamalan housemaid, who had transferred the disease to the man. Three other cases involving Jews and migrant workers in the area were shown to have the same cause.

    Reply to this comment
  8. DAV
    DAV October 31, 10:10

    Soros wants chaos and lie-beral DEMONocrats want voters…NO MATTER WHAT!

    Reply to this comment
  9. Kat
    Kat October 31, 10:50

    Somehow I knew my comments wouldn’t make it past the input page.

    I now know EVERYTHING about you that I really need to know. Ta…

    Reply to this comment
  10. Nadine
    Nadine October 31, 18:35

    The pictures tell the story, it is basically adult men. So that cannot be denied.. They are all criminals, they are coming over the border illegally. If they were refuges they would have stayed in the first country they came to. They are an invasion, they are not asking to come in, they are demanding entry.

    Reply to this comment

Write a Comment

Special Offer

Latest Comments

"Harvest-able trees" aren't the only things that need to be cut or burned before they...

There is not a harvest-able tree within 50 miles of Malibu; how do you explain...

I guess you don't know how to read. His name is Larry Horist. His name...

Take a Look!

12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt Displaying 12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt.

Don’t Miss This!

12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt Displaying 12174 - DimWit Politics - Display - 300x250 B - [WEB].txt.